> 
> David, what do you think too? Making this the alpha2.2 would be useful
> from a technical standpoint, and it would also give us a few more days
> to polish the Sims-like leveling. But I don't know what you have in
> mind
> to finish alpha2.1 and for alpha2.2. Especially because the completion
> of alpha2.0 and 2.1 depend on Ajaxim, and it doesn't look like it's
> going to get completed quickly.

[David] yes it seems like a good idea, as we can take this opportunity here
as you say to catch up with the 1.2, 2.0 and 2.1 (along with polishing the
sims leveling).

For the remaining work for these iterations is :

1.2 : Integration of AjaxIM in Hackit
2.0 : bug 612470 & follow-up on code review
(http://community.hackit.cx/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=4789&start=0&amp)
2.1 : frontend of missions with AjaxIM (still to be tested) and bug 605623
and 611815 (or will this one be related to 2.2 ?)

Vlad are you ok with this ?
As I don't how this can be done given the dependencies with Ajaxim
improvements, I'd like your opinion Vlad : The modifications on AjaxIM have
to be done first or can we test the iterations without them ? And if we can
test without them, what will you be able to finish by tomorrow night, and if
we follow Xav's suggestion for the 2.2, what will you be able to finish by
next week on Thursday ? 

On the side, Xav, there are a few tech bugs on the database that you entered
without a milestone, do you want to have a look and pick a milestone
according to the priority ?

_______________________________________________
Hackit Bar mailing list - [email protected]

Wiki:  http://community.hackit.cx/
List:  http://community.hackit.cx/ml/
Forum: http://community.hackit.cx/forum/
Ideas: http://community.hackit.cx/ideas/
IRC:   irc://irc.freenode.net/#politis

Reply via email to