> > [David] yes it seems like a good idea, as we can take this opportunity > here > as you say to catch up with the 1.2, 2.0 and 2.1 (along with polishing > the > sims leveling). > > For the remaining work for these iterations is : > > 1.2 : Integration of AjaxIM in Hackit > 2.0 : bug 612470 & follow-up on code review > (http://community.hackit.cx/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=4789&start=0&) > 2.1 : frontend of missions with AjaxIM (still to be tested) and bug > 605623 > and 611815 (or will this one be related to 2.2 ?) > > Vlad are you ok with this ? > As I don't how this can be done given the dependencies with Ajaxim > improvements, I'd like your opinion Vlad : The modifications on AjaxIM > have > to be done first or can we test the iterations without them ? And if we > can > test without them, what will you be able to finish by tomorrow night, > and if > we follow Xav's suggestion for the 2.2, what will you be able to finish > by > next week on Thursday ?
[Vlad] I would like to finish the modification from the code review on alpha2.0 by tomorrow night. In this way, Xavier could take another look and see if I got them right. Starting Friday, I can either start with the ajaxim + mission frontend or I can go with the OO implementation + UML schema. Maybe we can have a call on Friday morning to see what we choose? _______________________________________________ Hackit Bar mailing list - [email protected] Wiki: http://community.hackit.cx/ List: http://community.hackit.cx/ml/ Forum: http://community.hackit.cx/forum/ Ideas: http://community.hackit.cx/ideas/ IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#politis
