On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 22:56 +0300, Vlad Dragu wrote: > [Vlad] indeed it’s much easier to follow the tasks for each iteration > when they are structured this way. One note though, you placed all > dates for “current & next iterations” in October and I think you meant > September
Agreed! This is really god, thanks David. I still also owe you a few answers on the task tracker that you asked some time ago, and that I didn't had time to have a look at yet. If some of those are urgent, let me know, I'll try to have a look at it quickly. Btw, one remark - for references purposes, it would be helpful to not only have the tasks to complete for each iteration, but also the ones that have been completed. Maybe an additional section for that? > [Vlad] I’m on track with the training iteration. I finished going > through patters this evening and I will start the exercises tomorrow. > One thing I learned in the process is that switching to OO code will > require a little more than just packing the code into classes. I need > to change the way I think about the structure of code and the relation > between different elements. So I estimate at least a full iteration to > swith to OO code. Sounds realistic yep. > Also, we must take into account the date of my departure to the US. I > will be leaving on Wednesday the 29th. > I’m not sure what will be the agenda of our week in Montreal, but > maybe it can be a good time to work on the OO transition? Yup, good idea - finishing the OO transition by the end of the Sprint sounds like a good goal. > For 2.1 I estimate around 3 days. Do we agree that we go with a custom > implementation on this phase instead of AjaxIM? On my side it's good, yup. Xavier. _______________________________________________ Hackit Bar mailing list - [email protected] Wiki: http://community.hackit.cx/ List: http://community.hackit.cx/ml/ Forum: http://community.hackit.cx/forum/ Ideas: http://community.hackit.cx/ideas/ IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#politis
