There are several reasons why that code in e1000_probe had to be
changed:

 - It reads from chip variant specific register (present only on
   i210) in a chip variant agnostic codepath

 - It makes no sense to check for FLUPD bit to make a decision weither
   to validate EEPROM or not since its function per datasheet is:

   " ... Flash Update.

     Writing 1b to this bit causes the content of the internal 4 KB
     shadow RAM to be written into one of the first two 4 KB sectors
     of the Flash device (Sector 0 or Sector 1). The bit is
     self-cleared immediately... "

   and it is only through sheer serendipity the defined value for
   bitmask for FLUPD is equivalent to bitmask for FLASH_DETECTED bit
   which is the bit we actually care about and need to test against
   (FLUPD for i210 has a different bitmask)

Fix those problems by replacing the i210 specific check inside of
e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum() with a chip agnostic one and using
correct bitmask.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h  |  1 +
 drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/net/e1000/main.c   |  3 +--
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
index 98954d9..661ee1a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
@@ -794,6 +794,7 @@ struct e1000_eeprom_info {
 #define E1000_EECD_SELSHAD   0x00020000 /* Select Shadow RAM */
 #define E1000_EECD_INITSRAM  0x00040000 /* Initialize Shadow RAM */
 #define E1000_EECD_FLUPD     0x00080000 /* Update FLASH */
+#define E1000_EECD_I210_FLASH_DETECTED (1 << 19) /* FLASH detected */
 #define E1000_EECD_AUPDEN    0x00100000 /* Enable Autonomous FLASH update */
 #define E1000_EECD_SHADV     0x00200000 /* Shadow RAM Data Valid */
 #define E1000_EECD_SEC1VAL   0x00400000 /* Sector One Valid */
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
index 2e5d46e..a7059f6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/eeprom.c
@@ -358,8 +358,13 @@ int32_t e1000_init_eeprom_params(struct e1000_hw *hw)
                eeprom->use_eerd = true;
                break;
        case e1000_igb:
-               /* i210 has 4k of iNVM mapped as EEPROM */
-               eeprom->type = e1000_eeprom_invm;
+               if (eecd & E1000_EECD_I210_FLASH_DETECTED) {
+                       eeprom->type = e1000_eeprom_flash;
+                       eeprom->word_size = 2048;
+               } else {
+                       eeprom->type = e1000_eeprom_invm;
+               }
+
                eeprom->use_eerd = true;
                break;
        default:
@@ -660,6 +665,15 @@ int e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 
        DEBUGFUNC();
 
+       /*
+         Only the following three 'types' of EEPROM can be expected
+         to have correct EEPROM checksum
+       */
+       if (hw->eeprom.type != e1000_eeprom_spi &&
+           hw->eeprom.type != e1000_eeprom_microwire &&
+           hw->eeprom.type != e1000_eeprom_flash)
+               return 0;
+
        /* Read the EEPROM */
        if (e1000_read_eeprom(hw, 0, EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG + 1, buf) < 0) {
                dev_err(&hw->edev.dev, "Unable to read EEPROM!\n");
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/main.c
index 4a527a3..7ee78c3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/main.c
@@ -3558,8 +3558,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct 
pci_device_id *id)
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
-       if ((e1000_read_reg(hw, E1000_EECD) & E1000_EECD_FLUPD) &&
-           e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(hw))
+       if (e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(hw))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        e1000_get_ethaddr(edev, edev->ethaddr);
-- 
2.5.5


_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to