RK3399_PLLCON() and RK3588_PLLCON() are identical, but using the RK3399 name in an RK3588 function seems confusing.
Signed-off-by: David Jander <da...@protonic.nl> --- drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c index 64f9e0dc5e..548cbe391a 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static int rockchip_rk3588_pll_set_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll, /* set pll power down */ writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 0), - pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(1)); + pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(1)); /* update pll values */ writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(rate->m, RK3588_PLLCON0_M_MASK, RK3588_PLLCON0_M_SHIFT), -- 2.47.2