RK3399_PLLCON() and RK3588_PLLCON() are identical, but using the RK3399
name in an RK3588 function seems confusing.

Signed-off-by: David Jander <da...@protonic.nl>
---
 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
index 64f9e0dc5e..548cbe391a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static int rockchip_rk3588_pll_set_params(struct 
rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
        /* set pll power down */
        writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN,
                             RK3588_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 0),
-              pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(1));
+              pll->reg_base + RK3588_PLLCON(1));
 
        /* update pll values */
        writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(rate->m, RK3588_PLLCON0_M_MASK, 
RK3588_PLLCON0_M_SHIFT),
-- 
2.47.2


Reply via email to