I hesitate to suggest this given the recent thread about xquery file extensions :-), but an alternative solution to this might be to expose the extensions used for by restxq scan as a config option. I guess this currently is *.xqm *.xq. If I could set this to, for example, *.xqa, for "xquery active" or "xquery annotated", then the problem would go away.
/Andy On 16 June 2014 16:21, Andy Bunce <[email protected]> wrote: > >Did you already try to move all non-restxq modules into the repository? > I am sure that works but it does not seem the right use of the repository to > me, particularly if those modules start to reference other non xqm files. > > /Andy > > > On 16 June 2014 16:07, Christian Grün <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > My motivation is to find a restxq config that avoids the "parsing tax". >> >> Did you already try to move all non-restxq modules into the >> repository? That's what we usually do. >> >> Pre-compilation will fix various of the problems, too (but this is >> still on our list, and non-trivial..). >> >> Christian >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Andy Bunce <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Thanks, I will give it a go. >> > My motivation is to find a restxq config that avoids the "parsing tax". >> I am >> > thinking of trying setting RESTXQPATH to restxq. >> > Then using this structure: >> > webapp >> > -app1 >> > --mod2.xqm >> > >> > -restxq >> > --app1 >> > ---restmod1.xqm >> > >> > -static >> > --app1 >> > ---index.html >> > >> > Where restxq/app/restmod1.xqm etc all have declare base-uri "../../app"; >> > >> > Unless there is another imminent solution to this in the works :-)? >> > >> > /Andy >> > >> > >> > On 16 June 2014 14:14, Christian Grün <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Andy, >> >> >> >> I agree that relative base-uri declarations should always refer to the >> >> location of the current query file, no matter in which context. This >> >> should be fixed in the latest snapshot [1]. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Andy Bunce <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > It seems that in restxq mode relative paths for declare base-uri are >> >> > resolved differently [1]. If I have >> >> > >> >> > -webapp >> >> > --folder1 >> >> > ---mod1.xqm (which has import module namespace xm='test' at >> 'mod2.xqm';) >> >> > ---mod2.xqm >> >> > The import works. If I add >> >> > declare base-uri "."; >> >> > to mod1. the import fails, running the same code not via restxq and >> it >> >> > works. >> >> > Is this intended behavior? >> >> > /Andy >> >> > >> >> > [1] >> >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-xquery-30-20140408/#id-base-uri-decl >> > >> > >> > >
