Absolutely fair point, thanks for the correction. I shouldn't have implied that this was "Andy's" thing, and obviously many people feel strongly about it. There was something in the minutes preceding that, too, so this has been ongoing for a bit.
While I'm a "No" supporter, I have decidedly mixed feelings about the response to Pam's post. However, per previous comment, I don't think they're appropriate to discuss on-list, so will simply leave an offer to discuss them out-of-band. Geo On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Fred C. Moulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 11:54 -0700, Geo Mealer wrote: >> Relevant or not, I'm finding the whole thing unpleasant, especially >> some of the ways in which the conversation turned yesterday. >> >> I think Andy got his original political point across, and I imagine >> most people have made up their mind one way or the other on 8. >> > > I think it is important to remember it Pam posting a Yes on Prop 8 > message that started this. After that message appeared several people > responded including me and then Andy responded. > > So I want it very clear that this entire episode was started by a Yes on > Prop 8 person. And in my opinion if another Yes on Prop 8 message pops > up on this list then I expect the it will get an even harsher response > the first one. > > Fred > > > _______________________________________________ > Basfa mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basfa.org/listinfo.cgi/basfa-basfa.org > -- Geo Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Basfa mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basfa.org/listinfo.cgi/basfa-basfa.org
