[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16118064#comment-16118064
 ] 

Sven Haster commented on BATIK-1197:
------------------------------------

Excluding jython seems to work (ie, it removes the duplicate classes from our 
classpath) but it is unclear how strong the dependency on jython exactly is in 
1.9.1 so we refrained from upgrading. 

Ie:


{code:xml}
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
...
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.xmlgraphics</groupId>
<artifactId>batik-script</artifactId>
<version>${topicus.version.org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik}</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.python</groupId>
<artifactId>jython</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
...
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
{code}


[~tmortagne] This might be a stopgap solution for you if you need to upgrade.

> Non optional dependencies on jython and rhino added in 1.9.1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BATIK-1197
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197
>             Project: Batik
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Scripting
>            Reporter: Thomas Mortagne
>
> Note: can't find the 1.9.1 version so I did not set it in "Affects Version/s".
> Looks like a big change for a minor version. Is this really expected ?
> Maybe 1.9.1 was release by mistake ? I can only see it in Maven central but 
> can't find a version here on any corresponding tag in 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/batik/tags/



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Reply via email to