[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16120367#comment-16120367
]
simon steiner commented on BATIK-1197:
--------------------------------------
from Glenn Adams:
In ANT builds, the inclusion of jpython/rhino support is conditioned on their
presence on the build machine, so past release builds may or may not include
compiled classes that reference these dependencies. I haven't studied past
release builds to determine which do or do not include these classes.
The current Maven build, however, always include such classes (in the
batik-script module), and may require runtime access to these deps. It may be
useful to create a variant build of batik-script, call it batik-script-jpython,
that does include the jpython interpreter classes and leave the "standard"
batik-script module without this dep.
I have not studied this in depth to consider the pros/cons.
> Non optional dependencies on jython and rhino added in 1.9.1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BATIK-1197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197
> Project: Batik
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scripting
> Reporter: Thomas Mortagne
>
> Note: can't find the 1.9.1 version so I did not set it in "Affects Version/s".
> Looks like a big change for a minor version. Is this really expected ?
> Maybe 1.9.1 was release by mistake ? I can only see it in Maven central but
> can't find a version here on any corresponding tag in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/batik/tags/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
