Sven Haster commented on BATIK-1197:

Yeah, I'd also rather see these dependencies made 
That is a superior way way of handling optional dependencies to excluding them, 
not in the least because it is handled in the declaration of the dependencies 
in the artifact instead of wherever the artifact is being used as a dependency 

Especially the jtyhon artifact is .. not very well constructed, to say the 
least, and we don't want it on our classpath.

For now we also stick to 1.9(.0)

> Non optional dependencies on jython and rhino added in 1.9.1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: BATIK-1197
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1197
>             Project: Batik
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Scripting
>            Reporter: Thomas Mortagne
> Note: can't find the 1.9.1 version so I did not set it in "Affects Version/s".
> Looks like a big change for a minor version. Is this really expected ?
> Maybe 1.9.1 was release by mistake ? I can only see it in Maven central but 
> can't find a version here on any corresponding tag in 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/batik/tags/

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Reply via email to