Hi Archie,
Archie Cobbs wrote:
It appears that whereas in Batik 1.5.1, a <text> tag with a missing "font-family" would still appear, but in Batik 1.6 the text does not appear without a "font-family" attribute. Adding font-family="Arial" (for example) makes it appear again.
I seem to be a broken record today, but it works fine for me in 1.6. Does it really not show for you with a fresh copy of the 1.6 squiggle?
For example, view this in squiggle 1.5.1 and squiggle 1.6:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd"; >
<svg height="100" overflow="visible" viewBox="0 0 100 100" width="100" xml:space="preserve" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";> <text font-size="10" text-anchor="middle" x="50" y="50">Hello World</text></svg>
Just curious.. is this a regression or a bug fix?
Thanks, -Archie
__________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
