Thomas DeWeese wrote:
It appears that whereas in Batik 1.5.1, a <text> tag with a missing
"font-family" would still appear, but in Batik 1.6 the text does not
appear without a "font-family" attribute. Adding font-family="Arial"
(for example) makes it appear again.
I seem to be a broken record today, but it works fine for me in 1.6.
Does it really not show for you with a fresh copy of the 1.6 squiggle?
No.. but I'm not surprised. This is probably another JVM font issue
(I've had some in the past).
Is that possibility consistent with what you know about how Batik handles
text with no explicit "font-family" ? What is the "default" font family?
Thanks,
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
