On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Oh come now, that's not a very fair comparison. The functionality of
> the completion function is really quite simple. It was just augmented
> repeatedly without breaking out routines, until is is now an
> unmanageable mess. It needs to be hacked with the byte saber.
Feel free to come up with a new, working version that does the job,
and I'll consider it for inclusion. It's working as designed right
now, and I'm not particularly inclined to invite more bugs by
rewriting it from scratch.
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
I really need to reinstate the witty comments, dammit.
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
