On Feb 9, 2017, at 3:37 AM, Greg Raven <[email protected]> wrote: > The obvious response is that when working with CSS -- that is, cascading > style sheets -- you shouldn't have to edit every style sheet that has > attributes for that ID. You should only have to edit the last style sheet, > right? That's the whole point of cascading, especially for styled IDs, > because you can have only one of any given ID per page. That's why I usually > apply an ID to something that needs a link from elsewhere (including a jQuery > modifier), and use classes for CSS styling.
No, not really. You might have a single attibute “body” that is set in a style sheet for phone sized devices, and set differently in a style sheet for people whose language is German, and another style sheet if the user is unfortunate enough o be running IE. So, editing a ‘single’ tag might easily mean having to find it in several different style sheets. -- Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures. -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBEdit Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bbedit.
