I see your point. If you're doing things the hard way, then this situation could be troublesome.
On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 9:42:27 AM UTC-8, Lewis Butler wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2017, at 3:37 AM, Greg Raven <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > The obvious response is that when working with CSS -- that is, cascading > style sheets -- you shouldn't have to edit every style sheet that has > attributes for that ID. You should only have to edit the last style sheet, > right? That's the whole point of cascading, especially for styled IDs, > because you can have only one of any given ID per page. That's why I > usually apply an ID to something that needs a link from elsewhere > (including a jQuery modifier), and use classes for CSS styling. > > > No, not really. > > You might have a single attibute “body” that is set in a style sheet for > phone sized devices, and set differently in a style sheet for people whose > language is German, and another style sheet if the user is unfortunate > enough o be running IE. > > So, editing a ‘single’ tag might easily mean having to find it in several > different style sheets. > > -- > Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random > signatures. > > -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBEdit Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bbedit.
