On Monday, 12 February 2007 02:18, Larry Finger wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > It doesn't help in my case.  The behavior is similar to that without the 
> > patch,
> > but also with the patch it loses the association entirely.
> 
> Thanks for trying.
> 
> Do you have this patch installed? If you do, please try increasing the 100 to 
> 200.

Hm, but it wouldn't help to get the microcode to respond after the resume ...

I'm still thinking the problem is with the firmware.  Where exactly is it
stored?

> 
> 
> Larry
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx.h
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx.h
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>  #define PFX                          KBUILD_MODNAME ": "
> 
>  #define BCM43xx_SWITCH_CORE_MAX_RETRIES      50
> -#define BCM43xx_IRQWAIT_MAX_RETRIES  50
> +#define BCM43xx_IRQWAIT_MAX_RETRIES  100
> 
>  #define BCM43xx_IO_SIZE                      8192
> 

Greetings,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to