Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 13 February 2007 00:24, Michael Buesch wrote: >> On Tuesday 13 February 2007 00:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Monday, 12 February 2007 23:20, Larry Finger wrote: >>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 12 February 2007 02:18, Larry Finger wrote: >>>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>>>> It doesn't help in my case. The behavior is similar to that without >>>>>>> the patch, >>>>>>> but also with the patch it loses the association entirely. >>>>>> Thanks for trying. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have this patch installed? If you do, please try increasing the >>>>>> 100 to 200. >>>>> Hm, but it wouldn't help to get the microcode to respond after the resume >>>>> ... >>>> Yes it would. That count is how long the system waits for the firmware to >>>> respond. >>>> >>>>> I'm still thinking the problem is with the firmware. Where exactly is it >>>>> stored? >>>> In the memory of the microprocessor on the card. >>>> >>>> Please do what I asked. >>> With or without the previous patch? >> Both, please. > > It doesn't help in either case. I get > > albercik:~ # ifconfig eth1 down > albercik:~ # ifconfig eth1 up > SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device > > in both cases. > > I think the problem is that the firmware is not present and requesting it > doesn't work for some reason.
PLEASE SEND OUTPUT FROM dmesg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
