On Sunday 05 August 2007, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 18:47 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > Yeah, I'd like to get rid of this message, too. But by fixing the > > bug and not by hiding it. > > > > So any suggestions on how to fix this? > > I think you could try to write a detailed explanation of the problem, in > particular, what those tables do, where the numbers come from, what > hardware is affected, what the driver does now, what it should do, and > how to find out the right solution from reverse engineering data.
If I knew all these things, I would fix it. > After all, there are working drivers for the chipset, and they can be > reverse engineered. It cannot be a problem with no solution. > > Chances are that you will have some ideas before you finish writing the > message. It happened to me many times. But even if it doesn't happen, > you will make it easy for others to suggest solutions. And you will > give the reverse engineering team some ideas what to look for. Well, it's not that easy. Current code just doesn't make any sense. I do not understand how hardware power control works exactly, so I can't write some detailed message or something. That's probably a chicken and egg problem ;) _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
