On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 18:24 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Friday 18 April 2008 18:17:23 Stefanik Gábor wrote: > > According to the README of the Vista driver, the card supports Afterburner, > > To be honest, I don't care for afterburner. It's a horrible > proprietary extension and it's (IMO) not really what people should > be using. > So I'm OK with leaving that bit off. (it's unused in any case).
Yeah, the afterburner bit doesn't matter. I think it's marketing thing anyway because afterburner is actually just 802.11e/n frame aggregation in a broadcom-proprietary way, so it isn't really a question whether hw supports it or not, but more whether the vendor wants it on the box or not... I think. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
