John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:26:05PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 11:06 -0400, Frank Middleton wrote: >> >>> Updated FC8 kernel that worked fine 2.6.25.6-27.fc8 >>> FC9 kernel (that has the regression) 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.x86_64 >> I would probably try to bisect it. I realize that it's a lot of work. >> >> The breakage is caused either by patches or by configuration changes. >> Finding out is the first step. Then look for the patch or for >> configuration change that affects the problem. > > Sorry I missed the original post -- my reply is really to the OP > rather than to Pavel. > > It would probably be better to report Fedora distribution problems > on Fedora lists rather than the general upstream lists. That said, > since -27.fc8 is working for you, you should probably try the -fc9 > kernel built on the same date: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=52606 > > Perhaps it isn't obvious, but not every F9 kernel is newer than every > F8 kernel. > > Hth!
It did # uname -a Linux apogee10.apogeect.com 2.6.25.6-59.fc9.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 13 16:20:31 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux works like a charm! One learns something new every day :-) Thanks again -- Frank _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
