On Jan 30, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Larry Finger wrote:

> Francesco Gringoli wrote:
>
>> we just finished a couple of stressing tests and everything went  
>> fine,
>> kernel did not complain about anything, below is attached the tests
>> description. Just a few questions
>>
>> - have you applied any recent patch to the kernel (we too are using
>> 2.6.29-rc2-wl), so that your kernel can behave differently than ours?
>> - are you sure you are using the correct initvals files? Those we put
>> today on the website?
>> - have you replaced _all_ the files, including shm.inc etc? Here we
>> redefined the txheader layout and moved the cookie address
>> - are you modprobing by setting qos=0?
>> - is your card a PCCARD or PCI?
>
> The only patch I had applied to 2.6.29-rc2-wl was to have b43 look for
> opensource firmware before the proprietary version. The complete set
> of files from the openfwwf-5.1.tar.gz were applied and the firmware
> built from them. I am modprobing with qos=0 and nohwcrypto=1. I have a
> PCCARD format. It is labeled as a Linksys WPC54G, ver. 3.
Larry,

just one more question: if you have time to test again r5.1, not a  
stress test, a wget is enough, could you please report info about rx  
and tx_ring usages? Those lines like the following:

[219861.208427] b43-phy222 debug: DMA-32 rx_ring: Used slots 8/64,  
Failed frames 0/0 = 0.0%, Average tries 0.00
[219861.216070] b43-phy222 debug: DMA-32 tx_ring_AC_BE: Used slots  
128/128, Failed frames 1600/3398448 = 0.0%, Average tries 1.19

Cheers,
-FG
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to