On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Friday 30 January 2009 14:22:35 Lorenzo Nava wrote: >>> I think that's rather unlikely, however. The DMA code is basically >>> unchanged >>> for months and especially the slot handling hasn't changed in years. >>> >> >> Yes, but I didn't mean that the code has some bug. Let's say, for >> example, that all the DMA slots were filled; when the firmware will >> try to report a tx status it will send the informations to the DMA. >> The DMA won't have enough space to store it and so it will drop the >> message. In your opinion is it possible that something like that >> happened? > > No. TX status isn't passed through DMA in >=rev5 cores. > It's passed through MMIO registers which access an internal hardware > queue.
Ok, perfect, thanks. > > >> Please Michael, if you can, can you please check shm.inc header >> definition? > > Not yet. Maybe later. > Ok, tahnks. Cheers Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
