W dniu 6 stycznia 2010 20:36 użytkownik Michael Buesch <[email protected]> napisał: > On Wednesday 06 January 2010 20:29:36 Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> > You may read Documentation/SubmittingPatches and format your future >> > patches according to that. >> >> Well, that's really poor joke :| Manually creating .orig files, using >> "diff -up" and so dropping local commits "strategy"...? Er, I don't >> think I'll use this one. > > Nobody said you need to fix your internal workflow. Why would anybody care > _how_ you generate your patches? > You could manually type them into your cellphone with T9. If that it results > in a properly formated patch in the end, nobody would complain.
Good one! ;) > So yes, reading other people's patches probably is a good idea to start with. > > In general only put stuff into the mail that you want to show up in the commit > message. (If you want to have additional stuff that doesn't show up in the > commit > message, you can use the "---" delimiter. But that's documented elsewhere so > I don't have to explain that here...) I started composing that mail before got real idea of patches. I was still thinking I need some magic headers "diff" tool generates. Hope I totally understand this now and won't cause more problems to you guys :) -- Rafał _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
