Re: Radionics (Drought update)

[Gil Robertson]

Re: Drown. The line of Radionic training that I had and will teach is directly down line from Ruth Drown. She did major development work, taking the Abrams concepts and making major simplifications to the instruments. From something that took at least two strong men to carry, she came up with some thing with an infinitely greater capacity and about the size of a portable type writer. She greatly expanded the knowledge of "Rates" and developed a sequential, logical form of analysis (scanning for the "two knobers"). Most serious Radionics follows some form of this. She had a large number of sheets of rates, starting with one that determined which systems needed checking, thus if there is no problem, one does not check it. The instrument opened flat, with the lid to the left (or right for left handed people), the sheets are in the lid and a sliding pointer used to indicate the item being checked, while the rate is "put up" on the graduated knobs. The instrument used the well known "stick pad". The vary early Delawarr instruments (in the UK) were actually copies, as the FDA had stopped production of instruments in the US. George and those working with him soon made significant modifications and shortly abandoned the stick pad for the pendulum, which is vastly faster.

I know little about the history of the "two knob" school of Radionics, although I have read a couple of lots of course notes. I would invite some one working in that area to post on it.

George Delawarr and that group made huge advances. I believe the only member of the original Delawarr group still around is the wonderful Lavender Dower, known to a number of people on the list and whom I had the privilege to visit twice last year. Lavender still takes an avid interest in the still developing field of Radionics, encouraging us and is a fitting matriarch. Enid Eden, who would be about twenty years younger, and the Principal of Keys College of Radionics and Clare Longhorn, here in Oz are among the next lot, who were the young people on the edge of those pioneers. Enid was one of the team who did much of the development work on formalising our understanding of Agricultural Radionics. Lavender was the leading light in working on animals, particularly horses and farm animals. Malcolm Rae made big jumps in instrument design. His is widely known for his MGA Card based instruments, we use his "Base 44" for analysis and a large amount of treatments. The Base 44 is so quick compared with instruments like the "Base 10" and other Drown like instruments. Even the Peggetty and many of the paper based instruments are descended from the concepts of Drown, as they are based on her developments in analysis.

I think the major changes from Drown to now are that her analysis sheet was huge, bigger than A3 and double sided, while ours is on one side of an A4 with the treatments on the other. Tansley's work on the subtle anatomy greatly helped reduce the work on the physical, as if we with deal with issues on the subtle, we get to it before it manifests in the physical. It still takes six or more hours to do a full detailed analysis.

One could go on to mention many more, but the post os too long now.

Regards

Gil

Sarah Cherry wrote:

 What you say is true of, I believe, any device used to transfer the subtle energies...pendulum, whatever. The instrument is needed for focus, and, after a while, beings will attend to aid the work. Do you know of anyone carrying Drown's work forward? Also, have you ever heard of Oscar Brunler?

Sarah Cherry

  Gil Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi! Jane,
Radionics is a formalization of a number of closely related energetic
methodologies.