<<Markess wrote: "So do you sense this in your gut as an emotion
or in your heart mind as a feeling?">>

Dear Markess, Hugh & Gil et al,

I should be more specific with my words. I do not have 'thoughts' about
this, but more a "knowing". We are vibratory creatures. We have the ability
to form, focus and hold intent and project that holographically. We can be
working with trees, in partnership with nature, further deepening the
vibratory rate of our intent...Or we can be clear channels as in Reiki as
you say. Really I think we could do whatever we want, in whatever form of
energy signature in the way of accessing, holding, sending, being 'energy'
with nothing more than our own bodies.

Hugh, if you say people cannot hold focus or stabilize detailed intent, but
that you can tell a machine to do this for you, don't you FIRST have to give
the machine those detailed instructions? What, you can't work in the realm
of the invisible and have such conditions on your request, visualization,
manifestation whatever? One can't include in one's intent a time and space
element? Why not? Why does a machine do this better than I can?

The deeper I connect with my vibratory self, the more I see is possible to
see in the invisible realms. The more I work in partnership with my higher
self and my guides, the more there is to hear there. It's like any other
practice.

Having said that I also would say that I have not used a radionic device
that I am aware of. The part of me that I call my intuition, which is
something I have worked on & with for many decades, the part that gives me
unfailingly good advice (well, except for the time I blurted out that the
human body is the perfect radionic instrument)--is real clear about radionic
devices. For me, it is a clear NO.

Why? I feel/know that if for some reason my intent is not for the greater
good, that Nature, in her infinite wisdom can act in a self-regulating
manner that is for the greater good. I do not feel a machine has such
abilities.

Why not use a tree for broadcasting out to large areas? Why not use a circle
of trees circumscribing the areas to be covered in preps? Why not work in
nature? Why can't you set intent in great detail, lovingly co-created with
nature? I know you can. Forget belief here. It is a clear knowing. Sorry,
have no scientific evidence to back it up.

I think it would be great if someone would have a conversation with Steiner
about these things! You know, "direct perception". Have a talk with Herr
Steiner about radionics. Go Gil! Report back to us what he has to say.

Blessings,
Jane

----- Original Message -----
From: "Moen Creek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)




From: "jsherry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:37:05 -0500
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Radionics (Drought update)

But I do believe the
human body is the perfect radionic instrument.

Blessings,
        Jane

Quoting John Trudell the other day on our local LS Radio WORT "We need to
believe less & think more".
Jane what are your thoughts that lead you to this belief. What are your
experiences you base them on.
John also stated "Feelings are how the 'Being' speaks, emotions are all
civilization leave us with". So do you sense this in your gut as an emotion
or in your heart mind as a feeling?

In Love & Light
Markess

PS http://www.johntrudell.com/ has his new CD bone days


Reply via email to