Dear Allan, This is SO right. Stir as appropriate, not as told by rote formula. For years I have dowsed for how long to stir 500, 501, etc. and come up with times like 45 minutes, 43 minutes, whatever.
Let's not forget Greg Willis's rigid 60 minute rule. He believed that, and it was doubtless true for him even though he did the best job of creating vortices in a barrel I've ever seen. But according to the best I can tell we can get high end results with less stirring of fewer "perfect" vortices, which is not to say we will match Greg--who claims he is going to sue me for "stealing" his horn clay. He's still a genius and a good praticioner. But in some areas Greg may be or rather probably is all wet. One of the variables we are working with is our thoughts influence our experiments. So do Greg's. Greg meditates every morning for at least 30 minutes so he really focuses his thinking. Probably that influences his results more strongly. More of us should do that. In any event, I simply dowse for the appropriate potentization time. If for a homeopathic, like this one we're talking about, my pendulum indicates 15 minutes, that's it. If it comes up 5 minutes that's it. The essence of control is to use the EXACT amount of force that is neccessary, no more and no less. Aren't we seeking control? We should think about that. Don't we want to be more exact? Best, Hugh Lovel >actually, I did ask Merlin. My impression was that he said that the >20minute stir listed on the pre-potentized stuff was only there to >make people who equate time with mass feel more comfortable with the >pre-potentized stuff. In actuality, as in any step in potentization, >it just needs a 2 minute stir. > >Allan Visit our website at: www.unionag.org
