Jane Sherry wrote:

> Jean-Paul did not express interest, I was just lucky enough to be at the
> farm, ate some wonderful farm food, and mentioned the thread at bdnow. He
is
> well aware of how ridiculous the USDA org regs are as regards e coli, and
in
> fact mentioned that there could not possibly be any e coli in a properly
> made "compost" or compost tea!

Jean Paul has previously said that he looks to Will Brinton as his
composting guru. Brinton, in addition to advising us as to the proper shape
of cow horn for prepmaking, is also on record pointing out that there is
indeed a substantial possibility that 'properly made' compost and compost
tea can have E. coli in it.

Look at www.woodsend.org under publications, and make sure you have Adobe
Acrobat reader.

I hate to burst anyone's bubble, but if you are composting in a hurry, and
even following the hot composting regs, you may still end up with fecal
coliforms (E.coli and a few others) in the hundreds per gram, and can still
brew them up into the thousands per ml.

It may not happen every time, but apparently it can happen enough to make
compost tea on food crops a sort of negative lottery.

For that reason, compost tea advocates across the spectrum suggest that
compost tea for fresh produce crops be made from certified compost
containing no E.coli, especially no E.coli 0157:H7, the pathogenic form most
likely to cause problems, found in a recent USDA study in nearly half the
cattle herds in the USA.

Yes, in really good compost you won't find E. coli, and yes, in really good
compost tea E. coli will be reduced rather than grow.
Vermicomposting, which composters who have a long cycle are often doing even
without knowing it, will crash E. coli pops in as little as 7-60 days,
perhaps due to the presence of certain amoebae that worms carry which find
E. coli to be especially tasty...and/or perhaps due to other reasons
involving the commensal consortia of microorganisms associated with the
earthworms.

Does everyone out there have 'really good compost'? Frankly I doubt it. Do
the process standards required under the NOSB, or even recommended in Dr
Ingham's Compost Tea Manual, always result in 'really good compost'? No, I
think they do not.

Those standards are designed to produce compost which is below 1,000 MPN per
gram of fecal coliforms. Compost containing 100 or less MPN of E. coli (the
predominant fecal coliform) has been used in reasonable looking compost tea
brewers and been made to grow E.coli following various nutrient additions.
This compost is well within the accepted norm of 'properly made compost'.

So, while it may be true that many or most 'properly made composts' should
contain low or no E. coli and not grow them in compost tea making, it is
likely also true that some, perhaps even many 'properly made composts' do
contain E. coli and lack the antagonists necessary to reduce E. coli, thus
allowing growth to take place when suitable nutrients are added in a compost
tea situation.

Dr Ingham herself accepts as reasonable the suggestion that compost for tea
applications on fresh produce within 120 days of harvest be tested and
certified E. coli free.

I think she knows that not all 'composts' will qualify.


Frank Teuton


Reply via email to