Hugh and Lloyd, Regards to both of you. I am way behind with my emails, thus the long over due reply.
James, could I save you a lot of time, in regard to trying to measure Radionic Instruments, using electrical/ electronic type parameters. The Radio part of Radionics, is an early misconception by Abrams, who at the time thought that as Radio was new, his discovery must some how be able to be explained in those terms. The energy we are dealing with is not electricity, magnetic or for that matter, electromagnetism. We are dealing with another type of energy, which demonstrably travels faster than the speed of electricity/ light. Not only can it travel considerable distances, undiminished, it can travel to other levels and bring back information on those who have passed over. The current developments in Radionics, do not use instruments in the traditional sense. There are paper based instruments that work faster than the familiar black box with knobs. There is another difficulty in trying to measure instruments. The instrument is only a focus, the actual "work" is done by the practitioner's mind. So if you have difficulty getting a satisfactory measurement from an instrument, you may have to look at the person using it. Taking this one step further, there is little point measuring an isolated instrument, as, it, it's self, does nothing. It is the practitioner. It is like taking a set of bagpipes in isolation and making objective measurements, with no piper. While there are those unbelievers who do not consider that bagpipes ever produce music, without a trained and much practised piper, even I will agree that no recognisable music can be discerned. SO if you want to make comparative measurements, it is necessary to have some one actively using an instrument, while a second person makes observations and using some method, such as dowsing, make some form of value measurement. I understand that when the NSW Dowsers did some research on the effectiveness of a number of instruments, they made a number of standard Homoeopathic Remedies up, at a number of potencies and also bought current stock from traditional manufacturers. They covered all the containers and each dowser, dowsed contents and potency. The results were tabulated and the instrument prepared examples measured up closer to potency than those off the shelf. There were some differences in the out put of different instruments, that I should not put in the public domain, as I was not present and my information is second hand. If you examine the innards of most Radionic Instruments, the wiring does not conform to electronic logic. There are also some subtle details that are not obvious, so be careful, if buying an instrument, make sure it has been made by a Radionic Practitioner and not an instrument maker. At the least, consult your pendulum and ask: "Is this instrument appropriate for me to use to do ....." Gil James Hedley wrote: > Dear Lloyd, > At no point in my Email did I infer that you should throw away your > Refractometer or pH meter. Even although I dowse, to me figures or readings > from an instrument are equally fascinating. > That is why at this time I am trying to make radionic instruments with very > sensitive microvolt meters built into them to satisfy myself that I am > getting the action from radionic instruments that I think that I am > getting.. Rationalised testing of what I am doing has always been an aim of > mine. Snip
