Hi James

>  It seems that now famous quote of mine about 75% needs to be qualified a
> bit.
No need for that at all and hey I did say I thought you were better than
75%!
> You have attended one of my dowsing and radionics courses and have seen
the
> range of knowledge that you are able to divineby just knowing how to let
go
> of what seems to be the logical result
And a very interesting and enjoyable experience it was too - however I did
not feel any pressing need to throw my refractometer and pH meter in the
creek on the way home either. All of these things are tools,dowsing and
radionics included, and if we fixate on one of them to the exclusion of
other useful things, then I think we are on a wrong road. You've just shown
Roger dowsing and he is gonna fly with it - thats great -does'nt mean though
that that is the only way - what about those that don't yet do it that
well? - what about those S - T - R - A - N - G - E individuals like me that
are quite happy and comfortable with dowsing (and I do OK with it too) and
radionics, but still like to read the numbers on a conventional soil test,
and measure things with instruments, OK I know - a whole bunch of people are
gonna say thats using a crutch - " he's not game to go the last few steps to
freedom" or whatever. I dont see it that way and being the stubborn sod that
I am, probably never will.

>  If you can correctly foretell  the answers to
> 75% of the questions that derive from this short list you would be miles
> in front of your neighbours.

What I said was 'when I start spending for a cash grain crop' - poor choice
of words - but there had been some correspondence around foliar spraying and
in that light - 75% is not gonna cut it - specially when using  a
refractometer will take that into high nineties. I just dont see why this
has to be an either / or situation - to me there is plenty of room to
combine the best of both ideas.
> The one thing that I cant dowse is a foolproof method to make it rain.
I guess we will just have to disagree on this - I reckon if Hugh Lovel
thinks he knows how to do this then we are mad if we dont at least hear what
he's got to say - but again we dont have to fixate on one thing - we use the
kites too - and we use JP's nutritional tactics to make better use of what
rain we get
> However I dowse that if I put Muriel Morrison'.s radionic kites  around
the
> boundary to keep the energies in the chances of getting a dry year on our
> mountain is 30% and for Narrandera it is 20%.
> I will send you the design for these kites which I obtained from Gil
Thanks I would be very pleased to try these -
Cheers
Lloyd Charles


Reply via email to