Dear Ed, Greetings from the "Land of the Wizards of Oz" I will try to start the ball rolling in this discussion. I use various Radionic devices to broadcast preps and other homeopathic substances. Mostly with satisfying results. Never have I been an advocate of continuous broadcast. Short broadcasts used intermittently, in series,with a gap between the series have given the best results. Initial broadcast may be for a period of 3 or 4 days, then a break of at least a day, another couple of days of broadcast and then another break. However radionic analysis will indicate time and frequency of treatment. If I could find an interrupter as developed by Malcolm Rae, with it's pulsing action, that would probably be the most efficient. I agree with you that pulsed cyclic broadcast could prove to be the most effective form. It is most important to constantly monitor what is happening in the subject area being broadcast to. I don't know about Stella Natura but from experience trials have shown that the effect of Mercury in retrograde is detrimental to the efficacy of any homeopathic substance. Try making homeopathic remedies with Mercury in retrograde and measure the energetic patterns of your remedies. Then spray them out and visually compare the effects. Fundamental ray strength is decreased during this period. Use your pendulum to measure the strength of the fundamental ray of a tree and you will see that it varies from day to day. Sometimes the pendulum will swing maybe 12 inches or more out from the tree, another time it may only be a few inches. Something varies from day to day, exactly what is impossible to say. It is only by conducting long term research work with very accurate record, such as that conducted by the Kolisko's that we will really understand the effects of Electronic Homeopathy on plants, animals and soils.
You ponder that "Maybe cyclic broadcasts might be more effective, keeping the chaos/order energy-building process in mind. (Would the energy patterns start reverting towards 'chaos' after the broadcast was stopped?)". I have seen areas where the use of field broadcasters has proved detrimental, whether by the design, or placement of them, on the other hand there are many recorded instances where radionic broadcast have proved to be effective. Radionics is only one of many tools that can assist in farming. Understand the uses and limitations of each one. Whether a radionic broadcast during any period is detrimental, or not, I am unable to categorically affirm or reject, however my personal feelings are that to continually try to hold order instead of chaos/order will have long term detrimental effects. Life patterns are in a continual state of flux, with substance breaking down to form the building blocks for the renewal of life. How do we know when to enhance order and when to enhance chaos by not doing anything? The answer is continual radionic analysis to monitor the results of our actions. The beauty of radionic analysis is that you are able to pretest the likely effect of any proposed action. A classic case was at the last 'wizards conference' at Bellingen where we are able to indicate which of the BD preps would enhance the vitality of a particular soil, and which would decrease the vitality. BD preps are not benign substances, they are very powerful. Used in isolation they can just as easily as destroy productive soil as they can enhance life force in the soil or plants. I suppose that the point is "are we prepared to work with nature, or are we going to try to enforce our will over the life forces, and all the elementals". To try to exert control over nature to conform with our wishes by the use of continuous radionic broadcast is really no different to genetic engineering. Both are attempting to modify life energies, without any concern for the elemental life forces. The task is to be able to use both with wisdom, while doing the least amount of damage, while experimenting as to how far we can modify life energies, without destroying ourselves. Use radionic broadcast to enhance nature, gently and in moderation. Develop an awareness of what is going on around you, note the effects of your actions on all things, then one day you may be able to state that this/ or that are true. Through an understanding of the underlying principles of radionics and continual analysis of our actions will we be able to gain the wisdom to use radionics effectively without having the need to control the processes of nature. Go well James Hedley ---- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:04 AM Subject: <OnT> Does the benefit outweigh the detriment? > Folks, > > It has come down to my attention, a view, regarding the continuous > broadcast of the preparations using radionic devices. It seems there is a > concern that broadcasting these patterns during 'detrimental' time periods > (nodes and other Stella blackout periods) might be.well.detrimental. My > initial reaction was that these time periods are small portion of the > whole of time and that the "beneficial broadcast" time should out weigh > the 'bad". After thinking about it a while I landed on that maybe > discontinuous broadcast might have advantages. After all a blinking light > has more impact than an even brighter continuous light. Maybe cyclic > broadcasts might be more effective, keeping the chaos/order > energy-building process in mind. (Would the energy patterns start > reverting towards 'chaos' after the broadcast was stopped?)(The broadcast > does create more order?) So here I ponder. > > Would it benefit one to keep the Stella in hand when using a broadcast > device? Which 'events' would one want to let occur without a broadcast? > Would a 'scheduled' broadcast be more effective than one not? How does one > figure this out? > > I know a number of list members do broadcast. It might be beneficial to > discuss techniques and process. > > Trying to sort it out, > Ed > > >
