----- Original Message -----
From: James Hedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: <OnT> Does the benefit outweigh the detriment?
Dear James,
Can I put a different twist on the short broadcast?
(I dont think there's all that much wrong with longer broadcast times - as
long as we dodge the no go zones as you and Ed have already covered -
trines, nodes, mercury retrograde etc etc) - What I do think is happening is
that with shorter broadcast periods there is much more active and effective
participation by the person doing the treatment, and that is very
important.(I jokingly spoke of 'serious intent' at Bellingen - thats what I
mean here) I believe now that without that involvement, passive radionic
devices like a field broadcaster will not work to anything like their true
potential. Some people can maintain that active participation from afar
(Peter Bacchus - Hugh Lovel) others make it like a little ritual setting up
treatment, new potencies, putting it out there for a specific time etc. That
seems to be what works for me. So my take is its the better operator
involvement that is the main factor - What do you think?
Cheers
Lloyd Charles
