Dear Lloyd, As usual you have got to what may be the very crux of the matter. Short broadcast ensures the active participation of the owner of the radionic broadcast tool. I would like to cover this further when I get back from Albury. A participant at the Toowoomba Atmospheric Regeneration Workshop has given a glowing report card on the workshop, so it seems that we are in for a great time at Albury. Some participants could not get to Toowoomba due to the flood rains in SE Queensland. It seems that Coffs Harbour has had rains during the workshop there, and it is looking promising for patchy rain over the state this weekend. We still have not had catch up rain yet, but the longer we go without rain the closer to when it will rain. 7 inches of rain in 18 months is hard for anybody to survive. I vote that we dont allow Hugh to return to America as he seems to be much more popular with Australian farmers than in America. It seems that each of the 3 day workshops will attract in excess of 70 participants. Looking forward to catching up with you at Albury. Go well James
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lloyd Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:27 AM Subject: Re: <OnT> Does the benefit outweigh the detriment? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: James Hedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:48 PM > Subject: Re: <OnT> Does the benefit outweigh the detriment? > > Dear James, > Can I put a different twist on the short broadcast? > (I dont think there's all that much wrong with longer broadcast times - as > long as we dodge the no go zones as you and Ed have already covered - > trines, nodes, mercury retrograde etc etc) - What I do think is happening is > that with shorter broadcast periods there is much more active and effective > participation by the person doing the treatment, and that is very > important.(I jokingly spoke of 'serious intent' at Bellingen - thats what I > mean here) I believe now that without that involvement, passive radionic > devices like a field broadcaster will not work to anything like their true > potential. Some people can maintain that active participation from afar > (Peter Bacchus - Hugh Lovel) others make it like a little ritual setting up > treatment, new potencies, putting it out there for a specific time etc. That > seems to be what works for me. So my take is its the better operator > involvement that is the main factor - What do you think? > Cheers > Lloyd Charles > > >
