Dear Lloyd, You raise some good points. So it was extremely lucky that the burned areas did not receive any downpours, eh?
It seems that may written intention, used with ALL treatments by both Peter and myself, was this: If it be Thy will, let the powers of nature converge to bring in beneficial energies and to transform any detrimental energies into beneficial ones within the boundaries as marked for now and in the future for as long as is appropriate. Amen. This is pretty standard and it covers a multitude of possibilities to sin that might otherwise lead to grief. If it kept the mountains around Albury from getting deluged, so be it. In order to get those gentle rains you speak of you can write another intent card to go with that one that asks for " gentle falls of rain to germinate some ground cover and stabilise the soil before any major rainfall rips it to shreds." And you're right that it is customary to use some version of "For the benefit of all and the detriment of none." I left it off for brevity and because I interpret the b it about beneficial energies and transforming detrimental energies as covering that base. But you bring up something that is of overarching importance. Using radionics requires a purity of heartfelt intention, and an open-handed blessing of all, that sets the stage for getting results. To do it for narrow, selfish ends to ANYone's detriment is disempowering and usually it won't work. This is not to say you couldn't snip out GW's picture and treat him on necrosis in the heart muscle and lace the treatment with a slug of strychnine. You certainly could. But what actual good would it do? If you knew his real significance, "The Man Who Polarized the World into Peace by Trying To Rule It" you would applaud his performance as a class act, no matter the degree to which he is identified with what he is doing and has no external view on himself.. If you tried such a thing, who would most likely visit the mortician's slab would be you. Pure backfire, and not rare, either. In fact, by doing what he is doing with such arrogant self-assurance, he is waking up the very people he caught up in unconscious, knee-jerk reaction with 9 11 Best, Hugh > >Dear Hugh, >Tobias is correct about the rain around Albury, we had good rain at our farm >(almost five inches) and there has been from two inches up to ten or so as >you travel north from us into SE queensland, most of the eastern side of the >wheat belt and into the tablelands had useful to good falls and most of the >coastal strip from Victorian border to well up into queensland. The inland >areas - western NSW and Queensland missed out and that is a large area of >country - we had a not so subtle reminder of it yesterday - 40+ mph NW winds >carrying red dust all day when the wind eased and turned south west last >night we got visibility reduced to about 80 yards and quite a bit of >fallout. >The rain petered out as you got closer to Albury - most farmers around there >are probably not all that happy. However there are a few things to consider. > >1. There is several million acres of the alpine country and surrounding >forest areas burnt to a cinder - mostly in an arc around the east and south >east of Albury, probably the most damaging wild fires we have had since >white settlement. >2. much of this damage is within the catchment of the hume dam and a lot of >the rest is catchment for the snowy mountains hydro scheme >3. If the Albury area and east into the mountains had recieved the same >amount and like manner of rain that we got on our farm, it would have been a >disaster of mammoth proportions , the Hume dam would now be half full of >ash, mud and the remains of dead things, damage to infrastructure in the >high country would be a huge mess - what that country most desperately needs >is several light gentle falls of rain to germinate some ground cover and >stabilise the soil before any major rainfall rips it to shreds. >4. When we do these radionic treatments we ask ''for the good of all and to >the detriment of no one'' or something of similar meaning - do we interpret >this as ''for the greater good'' Visit our website at: www.unionag.org
