On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:10:00AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Chris Ball <[email protected]> writes: > > > Thanks for the reminders; I've merged both onto master now. > > While we're on the subject: the heavy documentation dependencies (in > particular, the ‘numpydoc’ dependency) are preventing the progress of > packaging version 1.0.0 for Debian.
Don't build the HTML docs then ;). Or remove the numpydoc plugin from doc/conf.py's `extensions`. Really, I think Debian should just package numpydoc ;). > Any chance of having the documentation not depend on ‘numpydoc’, and > incorporating that change into a new version? I think numpydoc strikes a nice balance between 'marks up well' (for posting on a website) and 'legible source' (returned by `help(whatever)` in interactive shells). The SciPy people liked it enough to break it out in its own package, all wrapped up for PyPI and everything. -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GPG (http://www.gnupg.org). The GPG signature (if present) will be attached as 'signature.asc'. For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy My public key is at http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/pubkey.txt
pgpACcGcmNTV6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Be-devel mailing list [email protected] http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel
