im running the 4gb image on my 8gb sdcard of debian on my bbb. i went to the link you said, and tried to follow the directions, but I want to net install onto the eMMC not the sdcard. is this possible booted to sdcard? that probably shows my newbieness right there lol. thanks in advance.
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 8:29:33 AM UTC-6, RobertCNelson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Jacob Bell <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > A lighter version of screenconnect that uses mono version 3.4 works good > on > > angstrom 6.20 and the latest image 9.4 but does not work with debian or > > ubuntu any version for bbb. > > > > The newer version 4.0 stable did not work on anything at all until the > beta > > 4.1 in which only worked mostly stable on the angstrom 6.20 image, but > once > > flashing to 9.4 it installs fine but never lets you set it up via the > > webpage setup link. Ubuntu and Debian not working of course. > > > > So it seems that the screenconnect team worked with some hacks to get > the > > more mono intensive version of 4.1 to work but nowhere near as stable as > on > > a windows machine. > > > > After researching out the links to requesting a good pure version of > mono > > for armhf, My findings are somewhat confusing to if it should work or > not. > > I will just take my gut feeling that the armhf needs master repositories > for > > mono that is hard-float and not just patched to work. Screenconnect > seems > > to continue to develop more and more features and that means mono for > armhf > > will be less and less reliable because its just patched to barely work. > > "more and more features" yet no one's cared to port mono to armhf... > It's a very niche audience.. > > > > > After posting my request on the screenconnect forum there was only 24 > hits > > to my link to ask for community support. This means I am a very small > > minority to want to have someone for free, write over 500 lines of code > and > > adjusting headers. > > > > I think unless the developer of screenconnect figures this out, I will > have > > to either use windows laptop to host the server, or i can use my > beaglebone > > black as a server but stuck on angstrom 9.4 image only able to have a > great > > stable 3.4 version of screenconnect to do my job supporting customers > > remotely. > > > > I am a total newb about what it takes to write code and make things work > in > > linux and am pretty sure it takes great efforts to make anything work on > > proprietary computers like the beaglebone. Time will tell...mono or > not to > > mono. > > There is the "armel" option... > > Use : https://github.com/RobertCNelson/netinstall > > With the "--distro wheezy-armel" option.. just don't complain about it > being slower then armhf.. > > Regards, > > -- > Robert Nelson > http://www.rcn-ee.com/ > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
