@*john3909* If I am not mistaken OMAP5432 has no DSP. Also I think it's too new processor and maybe risky to bother with.
@Nizamov Shawkat Actually the way they present the improvement in percentages is confusing at first glance. Instead check the numbers in useconds in previous columns. For example where it says 85.25% dsp time is 6317us and neon 42817 , ie the dsp finishes in the (100-85.25)% of time NEON uses. As for the article, they present dsp usage with unoptimized c code for dsp and optimized vlib c code for dsp (to my understanding) At last I also found this <http://kth.diva- portal.org/smash/get/diva2:402370/FULLTEXT01> In page 96 there is a comparison of dsp and neon What worries me is that neon execution time increases exponentially with data size. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
