From:  <[email protected]>
Reply-To:  <[email protected]>
Date:  Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 3:31 AM
To:  <[email protected]>
Cc:  <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject:  [beagleboard] Re: Vision on DSP

> @john3909
> 
> If I am not mistaken OMAP5432 has no DSP. Also I think it's too new processor
> and maybe risky to bother with.
OMAP5432 has the following DSP TMS320DMC64x+ and the processor has been
around for almost two years.
> 
> 
> @Nizamov Shawkat
> 
> Actually the way they present the improvement in percentages is confusing at
> first glance. Instead check the numbers in useconds in previous columns. For
> example where it says 85.25% dsp time is 6317us and neon 42817 , ie the dsp
> finishes in the (100-85.25)% of time NEON uses.
> 
> As for the article, they present dsp usage with unoptimized c code for dsp and
> optimized vlib c code for dsp (to my understanding)
> 
> At last I also found this <http://kth.diva-
> portal.org/smash/get/diva2:402370/FULLTEXT01 >
> In page 96 there is a comparison of dsp and neon
> 
> What worries me is that neon execution time increases exponentially with data
> size.
> 
> -- 
> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "BeagleBoard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to