From: <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 3:31 AM To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Subject: [beagleboard] Re: Vision on DSP
> @john3909 > > If I am not mistaken OMAP5432 has no DSP. Also I think it's too new processor > and maybe risky to bother with. OMAP5432 has the following DSP TMS320DMC64x+ and the processor has been around for almost two years. > > > @Nizamov Shawkat > > Actually the way they present the improvement in percentages is confusing at > first glance. Instead check the numbers in useconds in previous columns. For > example where it says 85.25% dsp time is 6317us and neon 42817 , ie the dsp > finishes in the (100-85.25)% of time NEON uses. > > As for the article, they present dsp usage with unoptimized c code for dsp and > optimized vlib c code for dsp (to my understanding) > > At last I also found this <http://kth.diva- > portal.org/smash/get/diva2:402370/FULLTEXT01 > > In page 96 there is a comparison of dsp and neon > > What worries me is that neon execution time increases exponentially with data > size. > > -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
