Thanks for your answers. Regarding software, I am still lost. I read follow this interesting presentation: http://coscup.org/2010/slides/14_1_1630_gpl_enforcement.pdf
and as far as I understand, I would not be allowed to sell a product based on the beagle bone black (without logo) with the Debian installed by CircuitCo given that I don't want to open my software that actually is running over a JVM with a licensed javaSE embedded (because I guess I can not either give commercial use to the open-jdk!). On Friday, November 11, 2011 1:34:32 PM UTC+1, David Goodenough wrote: > > I know that BeagleBoards are not supposed to be used in commercial > products, and that clones/derivatives should be used instead. > > I have also read in the BeagleBone SRM that "We mean it; these design > materials may be totally unsuitable for any purposes.". So its > obviously on our own heads - we can not blame anyone else. > > But that does not quite answer the question as to whether there is > the same prohibition on commercial use on the BeagleBone. > > David > > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
