So if I updated today, that should be what I get. But as I said, what I actually see is not "2.19-0ubuntu6.7" but "2.19-0ubuntu6" ( no ".7").
Am I checking incorrectly, or is ldd under-reporting, or is there some other relatively painless way to confirm which version is actually present? On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 9:48:17 AM UTC-8, RobertCNelson wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:38 AM, mickeyf <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > We have a number of BBB that are running Ubuntu 14.04. Everything I've > found > > on this bug/patch indicates that 'ldd --version' should show the > vulnerable > > version of libc as 2.19-0ubuntu6.6, and the patched one as > 2.19-0ubuntu6.7. > > Both before and after running 'apt-get install libc6' all I see is > > '2.19-0ubuntu6', with no minor version number. > > > > I don't know if this is because this is the ARMHF build, or for some > other > > reason, but the bottom line is I don't know whether these BBBs are > > vulnerable or not. Can someone suggest a simple alternate way of > confirming > > which libc6 is installed, or shed light on this? > > According to: > > http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/libc6 > > & > > http://ports.ubuntu.com/pool/main/e/eglibc/ > > 2.19-0ubuntu6.7 was pushed out: 16-Feb-2016 > > Regards, > > -- > Robert Nelson > https://rcn-ee.com/ > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
