On 02/23/2016 01:15 PM, mickeyf wrote: > I don't get that on my BBBs ( which have ubuntu 14.04, if that matters).
It's beyond my power to see what you actually do get for output if you don't post it. And I pulled that 'ldd --version' output from a 14.04 bbb as well. > I'm speculating that since what ldd is actually showing, as I understand it, > is the version number and dependencies of ldd itself, it is showing the > version number of what it requires, i.e. any libc6, not the one actually in > use, i.e. libc6.7. Or maybe more likely, libc6 is actually a link to > libc6.x, and that's what ldd is reporting? Pure speculation, tho'. I'd live > to hear to the real story. > > On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 11:41:30 AM UTC-8, Peter Hurley wrote: > > On 02/23/2016 10:47 AM, mickeyf wrote: > > Bingo! 'dpkg-query --show libc6 ' does show 6.7. > > > > Curious why ldd does not. > > ?? > > peter@black:~$ ldd --version > ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.7) 2.19 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
