The whole story:

vigil@VE1cba8ca9e5fb:~$ ldd --version
ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6) 2.19
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper

But at this point I don't care too much, it's now merely academic curiosity 
and is not getting in the way of getting anything done.

On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 2:33:41 PM UTC-8, Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> On 02/23/2016 01:15 PM, mickeyf wrote: 
> > I don't get that on my BBBs ( which have ubuntu 14.04, if that matters). 
>
> It's beyond my power to see what you actually do get for output if you 
> don't post it. 
> And I pulled that 'ldd --version' output from a 14.04 bbb as well. 
>
>
> > I'm speculating that since what ldd is actually showing, as I understand 
> it, is the version number and dependencies of ldd itself, it is showing the 
> version number of what it requires, i.e. any libc6, not the one actually in 
> use, i.e. libc6.7. Or maybe more likely,  libc6 is actually a link to 
> libc6.x, and that's what ldd is reporting? Pure speculation, tho'. I'd live 
> to hear to the real story. 
> > 
> > On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 11:41:30 AM UTC-8, Peter Hurley wrote: 
> > 
> >     On 02/23/2016 10:47 AM, mickeyf wrote: 
> >     > Bingo! 'dpkg-query --show libc6 ' does show 6.7. 
> >     > 
> >     > Curious why ldd does not. 
> > 
> >     ?? 
> > 
> >     peter@black:~$ ldd --version 
> >     ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.7) 2.19 
> >                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to