> I'm pretty sure we will have to back-port wayland from stretch.. > > But this scares me: > > > http://git.ti.com/gitweb/?p=graphics/omap5-sgx-ddk-um-linux.git;a=commit;h=8d4ba04a2da59989b21aacca9defdf387e321695 > > > the gcc 4.9 -> gcc 5.x was so much "FUN" in stretch over the summer, ^ > might mean we have to just use stretch.. > > I agree with you.... this commit could be determinant for choose a right strategy...this library now are built with gcc 5.x!!!
IMHO could be a good idea to work in stretch. >From debian.org site, on 2016-Nov will starts the freeze transition. So packets could be considered quite "stable" and I think it's better to use a tested environment, for the wayland complexity. Personally I don't like the back-port operation. The risk is to obtain a custom wayland version and discover new problems generated by backport, without debian support. Should be fantastic to have a minimal stretch image with kernel 4.4 + SGX, only console runlevel 3, without X, as base to start to try wayland. Other opinions are welcome. Regards, Matteo -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/2dddc45b-b415-4da2-b58a-f5d66eaf78ec%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
