Posted to myself instead of you William. Thanks for your input I will look 
further into it. As I said I'm not a programmer and was hoping that there 
was already an application out there that could be modded to suit. Further 
invetigation required.

Ian

On Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:14:16 UTC+10, William Hermans wrote:
>
> There is another way to go about this bit is slightly more complex, and 
> would require an additional "server" somewhere. This server could be 
> another embedded Linux system if you so wished. Such as a beaglebone.
>
> But basically how this works if you have an MQTT broker running locally, 
> with the MQTT subscriber( the remote beaglebone ) out in the wild 
> somewhere. The MQTT protocol while technically not very secure. Can be made 
> very secure if some serious thought is put into how you architect your 
> complete system. MQTT works by using a publish, and subscribe model. So one 
> can pretty much bullet proof how a publisher, and subscriber interact with 
> one another. 
>
> E.G. The Broker acts as a Publisher and Subscriber as well as does the 
> remote system. So the local, and remote system each have their respective 
> Published, and subscribed values. Which makes it very hard for "The man in 
> the middle" attacks, and probably impossible for input injection. 
>
> Here's a pretty good hackaday article on MQTT: 
> http://hackaday.com/2016/05/09/minimal-mqtt-building-a-broker/
>
> So this is actually a part of a set of articles by the same person I 
> believe. But this first article gives a pretty good overview of MQTT, and 
> the utilities available to Linux( debian ). Technically, you could even 
> write a set of shell scripts to accomplish what you want. But personally 
> I'd probably rather at least wrap these utilities from within another high 
> level language. Maybe even just use their API, and write my own code in C . 
> . . YMMV.
>
> After saying all of the above however. You'd probably want to completely 
> lock your remote and lcoal system down completely, and avoid using wireless 
> or bluetooth on either end. To be the most secure.
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/41c57feb-b478-48ec-be95-af6c42a77e0e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to