@tim-janik Thanks for looking in to this.
Yes, I'll close the issue now, cause I'm not likely toput in the needed time
either atm.
I do want to correct some misunderstandings:
> From what I understand, NixOS requires a lot of file path patching
Most packages don't need any manual patching, but some do.
> At the very least, you'll need /usr/bin/env.
NixOS has that, so changing shebangs upstream would help a lot.
> but paths hardcoded in the generated configure due to macros from
> /usr/share/autoconf/... are not under Beast's control. That simply requires
> significant porting effort on NixOS and should arguably be fixed/adapted by
> the NixOS autoconf + automake packages.
I don't know enough about autoconf macros to answer this, sorry.
I do suspect this isn't the first time it comes up, and NixOS has some plumbing
to deal with it.
> Of course that requires a working git setup, including git log and git
> describe, and unfortunately NixOS intentionally doesn't even provide that for
> package builds.
I wouldn't say it's intentional, but rather a side effect.
The effect is the same though...
> With every package in NixOS having their own bin/ directory, I also wonder
> how NixOS wants to scale up to supporting hundreds or thausands of package
> installations...
This is not an issue, since no duplicate packages are ever stored. Also: all
packages symlink to their dependencies. Or did I misunderstand you?
Thanks again for your time!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tim-janik/beast/issues/66#issuecomment-418337575
_______________________________________________
beast mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/beast
