Having further considered, I agree with not munging. I've not run lists
but I've run mail servers, so lets not make anything messier that we
don't need to. Next we'll be mucking with DNS resolvers for our local
convenience, as it appears Win2000 has done. Yikes!
I would recommend anyone who wants munging to follow the URL in the
earlier post on the subject and read. It changed my mind.
Many of my lists (I believe that's me below) are DOSneyland-centric,
and so are perhaps administered (read: munged) for the
computing-impaired like myself. Perhaps when I get a Real Operating
System...
> But don't break it for the rest of us. Contrary to what someone else
> said in this thread, the lists *I* subscribe to that do reply-to
> munging are in the minority, and of those lists, usually one message
> every two weeks is "oops, accidentally sent to the list, that was
> supposed to be private". That's just silly.
>
> Reply-to munging: just say no.
>
> --
> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503
> 777 0095
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
> See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl
training!
=====
---------------------------------
Notice: This e-mail is protected by the U.S. Constitution and the U.N. Declaration of
Human Rights. Unauthorized interception by any public or private agency is an ugly
sort of work to be in. Does your mother know you spend your days reading other
people's mail? Would she be proud of you?
---------------------------------
Please visit: http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/district41democrats
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
