On 9 Jun 2001, at 0:22, Karen Cravens wrote: > Not only that, but there's certainly a potential for abuse of the > Reply-To misfeature, unless the software is bright enough to look > for the sort of thing that... well, let's find out, shall we? Well, that answers *that* question. Hope anybody who replies to that knows how to use their email client effectively, or that the unsub is also verified... Further exercises in how evil *that* sort of thing could get are left to the reader... I am going *no* further down this road. -- Karen J. Cravens ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) iansmith
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Peter Scott
- RE: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Al Hospers
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Aaron Craig
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Paul Johnson
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Karen Cravens
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Karen Cravens
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Karen Cravens
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Karen Cravens
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Aaron Craig
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Michael Fowler
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Aaron Craig
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) rob chanter
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Mark Folse
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Karen Cravens
- Re: [META] Rants (was:Re: space) Kevin Meltzer
- <no subject> [EMAIL PROTECTED]