On 19 April 2011 16:00, Peter Scott <pe...@psdt.com> wrote:
...
> :[...]
> : * If you think what you are writing may be taken in a way you didn't
> : intend, please add a smiley :-) Many flame wars are stopped by a simple
> : smiley!
> : * No flames. If your fingers are burning as you are typing the email, it
> :  would likely be best not to send it.
>
> If anything is clear from that FAQ it is that the intention is to avoid
> flames on this list.  Casey and Kevin appear to have stopped monitoring
> this group some time ago, though.
>
> There is no shortage of lists, groups, or forums where people can get
> flamed for not following the rules, and people who want to flame them
> have an outlet for doing so.  I've already stopped reading most of them
> because it's not worth my time when most of the content is arguments
> about conduct.  I don't know whether communities inevitably fall into
> that mode after a while but this one at least had a good run and I'll be
> sorry if I end up leaving it too.
>
> Andy Lester had a good article about this: http://perlbuzz.com/2010/11/
> think-for-perls-sake.html.  But judging from the responses it seems he
> and I may be in a minority.


Is it time for our annual "Be nice" thread? I didn't realise a year
had passed so soon. I missed what triggered this one. Can someone post
a link to the thread please ( I did ask nicely ).
Dp.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/


Reply via email to