********************************************************************** This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Any misuse, transmission to unauthorised third parties or misrepresentation of any of the data contained in this email may may lead to MSV Ltd seeking legal redress. This note also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.marshallsv.com ********************************************************************** Bit of a newbie myself so excuse me if this has already been answered sufficiently - not too sure of the protocols on answering queries, especially ones wherein the answer isn't perl based. Yes NT does audit who changes the file - irritating as it is to admit it, in this case it has functionality that *nix doesn't readily provide. Regarding the security auditors with root access - wouldn't implementation of SUDO provide the auditors with the necessary access without giving them root privileges whilst at the same time providing the ability to audit their actions? But don't forget the security implications of SUDO, e.g. SUDO rights to run vi or emacs allows the user to break to the command line with root privileges - I think. Please check what I've said carefully before implementation, as I've said I consider myself a newbie and am only repeating what I've read and briefly implemented. Steve. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
