Dr.Ruud wrote:
JupiterHost.Net:
Templates are good and the poitn is:
PHP's main "advantage" is embedded PHP/HTML + using a template systems
make the embedded garbage useless = PHP is useless :)
I still can't follow you. Use the templates for the parts of your system
where templates are good for, and handcode the other parts.
Exactly :) Doing that you;ve just done in PHP's main "feature" embedding
the presentation in the funtionality :) So why not do it right with a
language whose main paradigm is the exact opposite.
if you're using templates of some sort then dump PHP (IE get
rid of all of tis really negative and many times dangerous stuff) and
use *any* other langauge that can also do templates and doesn't have
its negative attributes.
I don't mind using PHP for many parts of a website.
For example I like pear/Image_Graph,
see http://pear.php.net/package/Image_Graph
and http://pear.veggerby.dk/samples/
If you know a similar Perl module, please let me know.
Sure, search cpan for images.
A default PHP
installation includes the documentation.
I see, so why the urls then :)
You have PHP installed?
Not a chance :) I like to try and keep my systems secure, so no windows
and no PHP.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
