And please also give the platform id in the report, such as device_name "Intel(R) HD Graphics IvyBridge GT2" device_opencl_c_version "OpenCL C 1.2 beignet 0.9 (git-33a043e)"
The above info should be helpful. Thanks, Zhigang Gong. On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:52:43PM +0800, Zhigang Gong wrote: > Can't reproduce it here. Did you use the latest git master? > > The latest git version is > commit 33a043e903f9d61445d3fb7972becf83c2842276 > Author: Junyan He <[email protected]> > Date: Thu Oct 23 13:09:00 2014 +0800 > > Add the disasm support for Gen8 > > Signed-off-by: Junyan He <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: "Yang, Rong R" <[email protected]> > > > Just a reminder, when report a bug/issue, please update to the latest git > master version and test it again and if it could reproduce please write > done the git hash in the report. > > Thanks, > Zhigang Gong. > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 03:24:01AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi, All, > > I found one possible bug for review. > > if run the following: > > ./opencv_test_imgproc --gtest_filter=OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat*. > > OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 failed and continue. But the whole test > > flow will crash in OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257: > > [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/240, where GetParam() = (CV_8U, > > Channels(2), 7, 1, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (6433 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 (358 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 (311 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 (6 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 (203 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 (207 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 (203 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 (7 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 (210 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 (207 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 (208 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 (7 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 (214 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 (207 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 (212 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 > > [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 (7 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 > > /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:106: Failure > > Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst, udst)) <= (threshold), actual: 255 vs > > 1 > > Size: [92 x 61] > > > > /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:107: Failure > > Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst_roi, udst_roi)) <= (threshold), > > actual: 255 vs 1 > > Size: [92 x 61] > > > > [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256, where GetParam() = (CV_8U, > > Channels(2), 7, 4, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (7413 ms) > > [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 > > opencv_test_imgproc: /home/yanwang/beignet/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c:703: > > intel_gpgpu_check_binded_buf_address: Assertion > > `gpgpu->binded_buf[i]->offset != 0' failed. > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > > But if I run OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 only, it passed. I think 256 > > case may influence it. > > Thanks. > > > > Yan Wang > > _______________________________________________ > > Beignet mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet > _______________________________________________ > Beignet mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet _______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
